A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE IMPACT OF CASE BACKLOG ON THE RIGHT TO FAFFI AND SPEEDY TRIAL IN UGANDA

  • Type: Project
  • Department: Law
  • Project ID: LAW0461
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 68 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 317
  • Report This work

For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

Table of Contents

DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................................. ii

APPROVAL. .................................................................................................................................................. iii

DEDICATION ................................................................................................................................................ iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........•...................................................................................................................... v

LIST OF ACRYNOMS ........................................•...................................................................•........................ vi

LIST OF STATUTES .................•.................................................................................................................... vii

LIST OF CASES .....................................................•................................................................................... xi

Abstract .................................................................................................................................................... xii

CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................................. 1

1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................•............... 1

This paper examines the causes and impacts of case backlog on the enjoyment of the right to fair and

speedy trial to the citizens of Uganda and the study will explore into the legal and institutional framework

for monitoring the observance of the above mentioned rights. 1bis study will thereafter propose refonns

and recommendations to improve the enjoyment of the right to fair and speedy study ............................... 2

1.1 Background to the study ................................................................................................................... 2

1.2 Problem Statement ........................................................................................................................... 2

1.3 Aims and objectives ..............................................................•........................................................... 3

1.4 Research questions ........................................................................................................................... 3

1.5 Hypothesis ........................................................................................................................................ 4

1.6 Significance of the study ................................................................................................................... 4

1.7 Methodology ..............................................•...................................................................................... 4

1.8. Limitations ..•.................................................................................................................................... 4

1.9 Literature Review ..........•..............................................•.................................................................... 5

1.20 Chapter synopsis ........................................................................................................................... 11

CHAPTER TWO ............................................................•..............................................•...................•.......... 12

LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK REGULATING AND ENFORCING THE RIGHT TO FAIR AND

SPEEDY TRIAL IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE ................................................................................ 12

2.0 Introduction •..........................................•................................................................•....................... 12

2.1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK REGULATING SPEEDY TRIAL IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE ............... 12

2.1.11nternationallegal framework ..................................................................................................... 12

viii

2.1.2.11nternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights .................................................................. 12

2.2.1.2 Other international instruments ................•.............................................................................. 14

2.1.3 Regional Instruments ................................................................................................................... 15

2.1.3.1 The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights ................................................................. 15

2.1.1 National legal framework ............•................................................................................................ 17

2.1.1.1 The Constitution of Uganda, 1995 ............................................................................................ 17

3.1.1.2 The Human Rights (Enforcement) Act, 2019 ............................................................................. 18

2.1.1.3 Judicature (Plea Bargain) Rules, 2016 ....................................................................................... 19

2.1.1.4 The Prisons Act .......................................................................................................................... 20

2.1.1.5. The Police Act ......................................................................................................•.................... 21

2.2 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................... 22

2.2.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 22

2.2.3 The Judiciary ........................................................................•....................................................... 22

2.2.1 The Uganda Human Rights Commission ..........................•......................................................•.... 23

2.2.2. The Uganda Police Force .......•..................................................................................................... 24

Prolonged detention of suspects of crime in police facilities ................................................................ 25

(b) Delayed police investigations .•........................................................................................................ 25

2.3.4 The Uganda Prisons Service ......................................................................................................... 26

2.3 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................... 26

CHAPTER THREE .................................................................................................................................... 27

CASE BACKLOG AND ITS CAUSES IN THE JUDICIARY OF UGANDA ......................................................... 27

3.0 Introduction .......•............................................................................................................................ 27

3.1 Causes of case backlog in the Judiciary ........................................................................................... 27

The following are the causes of backlog in the Judiciary: ..................................................................... 28

3.1.1 Poor work attitude and poor performance by some judicial and non-judicial officers in the

judiciary Judicial staff: ...........................................................................................•............................... 28

3.1.2 Litigants and witnesses ................................................................................................................ 29

3.1.3 Advocates ..................................................................................................................................... 30

3.1.4 Delays in the criminal justice system ........................................................................................... 30

3.1.5 Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................... 31

3.1.6 Poor Storage and Record management .....................•................................................................. 32

3.1.7 Poorly planned and executed Session System ............................................................................. 32

ix

3.1.8 Jurisdiction ....................................•.......................................................................•...................... 32

3.1.9 Lack of optimal staff numbers ...................................................................................................... 32

3.2 Measures put in place to reduce case backlog in the Judiciary ....................................................... 33

3.2.1 Creation of High Court Circuits, Divisions and Magisterial Areas ................................................. 33

3.2.2 The Court Case Administration system (CCAS) ..................................•.......................................... 34

3.2.3 Mediation ..................................................................................................................................... 35

3.2.4 The Small Claims Procedure ......................................................................................................... 36

3.2.5 Plea Bargaining ............................................................................................................................ 36

3.3 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................... 37

CHAPTER FOUR ..................................................................................................................................... 38

THE IMPACT OF CASE BACKLOG ON THE ENJOYMENT OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR AND SPEEDY HEARING IN

UGANDA ............................................................................................................................................... 38

4.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 38

4.1 Backlog and the right to fair hearing .................................................................................•............. 39

4.2 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................... 45

RECOMMENDATIONS AND REFORMS ........•.......................................................................................... 46

5.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 46

5.1.11ncrease the number of judicial staff/ officials ............................................................................. 46

5.1.2 Use of technology ........................................................................................................................ 47

5.1.3 Physical Infrastructure ................................................................................................................. 48

5.1.4 Need to reform the law to increase Jurisdiction of the Magistrates ............................................ 49

5.1.5 Disposition without trial .................................................................................................... 49

5.1.6 Political sensitivity and sensitization ..................................................................................•......... 49

5.1. 7 Legal remedies against delays ...................................................................................................... 50

5.1.8 Performance standards ................................................................................................................ 50

5.1.9 Adopting a culture of joint responsibility ..................................................................................... 50

5.1.10 Case flow management and continuous practices ..................................................................... 51

5.2 Conclusion ......•................................................................................................................................ 51

References ............................................................................................................................................ 52

Abstract This paper explores issues concerning the impact of case backlog on the enjoyment of the right to a fair and speedy trial in the Ugandan justice system. In particular, it looks at how and why there have been many difficulties with the implementation of this universal set of values that have been recognized since the adoption of the formal legal system in Uganda, and which have been enshrined in the Constitution since independence. The Researcher used a doctrinal method of research to bring out both the international and national legal framework regulating the enjoyment of the rights to a fair and speedy trial in its chapter two and explains the meaning of the right to fair trial in accordance to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and then the municipal law protection of the right to a fair and speedy trial. The paper discusses the causes of case backlog in the judiciary in Uganda and puts forward the measures that have been put in place by the government of Uganda to reduce case backlog in the Judiciary. Measures like the mandatory Mediation for all civil suits to be commenced in all courts of Uganda and Plea bargaining for criminal offenders are already functioning to ensure reduction of case backlog hence the enjoyment of the right to fair and speedy trial. The paper goes ahead to explore into the effects of case backlog on the enjoyment of the right to fair and speedy hearing and finally the researcher proposes reforms and recommendations to stake holders to minimize delay caused by backlog to ensure the enjoyment of the right to fair tr

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE IMPACT OF CASE BACKLOG ON THE RIGHT TO FAFFI AND SPEEDY TRIAL IN UGANDA
For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

Share This
  • Type: Project
  • Department: Law
  • Project ID: LAW0461
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 68 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 317
Payment Instruction
Bank payment for Nigerians, Make a payment of ₦ 5,000 to

Bank GTBANK
gtbank
Account Name Obiaks Business Venture
Account Number 0211074565

Bitcoin: Make a payment of 0.0005 to

Bitcoin(Btc)

btc wallet
Copy to clipboard Copy text

500
Leave a comment...

    Details

    Type Project
    Department Law
    Project ID LAW0461
    Fee ₦5,000 ($14)
    No of Pages 68 Pages
    Format Microsoft Word

    Related Works

    Table of Contents DECLARATION ......................................................................................................................................................... ii APPROVAL. ................................................................... ~... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT This research paper analyses pre-trial detention (remand) in Uganda. It digs deep into the causes and effects of lengthy pre-trial detentjon and provides suggestions to end it. The paper gives appropriate history of the wider context of pre-trial detentions in Uganda that 5pans from the immediate post-colonial times of Uganda to the... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT This research paper analyses pre-trial detention (remand) in Uganda. It digs deep into the causes and effects of lengthy pre-trial detentjon and provides suggestions to end it. The paper gives appropriate history of the wider context of pre-trial detentions in Uganda that 5pans from the immediate post-colonial times of Uganda to the... Continue Reading
    Abstract This study was conducted in Central Uganda with the research entitled 'A critical analysis of the impact of mortgage transaction on Uganda's development. Uganda economy is smallholder agro-based employing over 80% of the population which is mostly rural. Women contribute the bulk (over 70%) of the agricultural labour force.... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT The PEDP Act 2013, raises legal issues which had to be resolved in order to understand its impact on the upstream sector of Uganda's oil industry. State participation, in the PEDP Act 2013, is only limited to 20% carried interest which is low when compared to Algeria at 51% carried interest, Cameroon at 50% carried interest, Nigeria at... Continue Reading
    TABLE OF CONTENT DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENT .................................................................................................................. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT... Continue Reading
    TABLE OF CONTENTS TOPIC Declaration ............................................................................................... .I Approval .................................................................................................. .ii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................ Continue Reading
    TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ..................................................................................................................... .i APPROVAL ............................................................................................................................ .ii DEDICATION... Continue Reading
    TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ................................................................................................ .i SUPERVISOR'S APPROVAL ............................................................................. .ii DEDICATION .................................................................................................. iii... Continue Reading
    TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ .ii APPROVAL ...................................................................................................................... iii DEDICATION... Continue Reading
    Call Us
    whatsappWhatsApp Us