THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE A CASE STUDY OF THE BAKASSI PENINSULAR CONFLICT 1993-2002

  • Type: Project
  • Department: History
  • Project ID: HIS0085
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 84 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 868
  • Report This work

For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853


ABSTRACT


          The discovery of oil reserves in the waters surrounding Bakassi Peninsula subjected it to claims and counter-claims for sovereignty, military occupation and recourse to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). On October 10,2002, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Peninsula and the territory in the Lake Chad region should be under the sovereignty of Cameroon. This judgment elicited sensitive scholarly issues of citizenship and self-determination as fundamental human rights. Also, it encountered difficulties in implementation, which following intensive diplomatic activities culminating in the 12 June 2006 Green Tree Agreement brokered by the United Nations and guaranteed by four world powers- Britain, France, Germany and United States, set the modalities of withdrawal and transfer of authority in the Bakassi Peninsula.


          This work, therefore, is a product of the study of the role of ICJ in the Nigeria-Cameroon boundary dispute. To this effect, we ascertained how the ICJ adjudication on the Bakassi Peninsula constituted the denial of the human rights of Bakassi citizens; the provisions of the Green Tree Agreement resolved the difficulties in the implementation of the ICJ ruling; the interests of external powers affected the adjudication and implementation of the ICJ ruling. We employed the schema theory of security dilemma as our analytical framework to provide a conceptual foundation for the study. Our method of data collection and analysis are qualitative and qualitative-descriptive methods respectively. In the final analysis, we posited that although the judgment was based on facts presented by both parties, the conduct of plebiscite that will take into cognizance the human rights of the Bakassi citizens would have been more effective in the settlement of the dispute.



TABLE OF CONTENTS


TITLE PAGE                                                                                  i


CERTIFICATION                                                                          ii


DEDICATION                                                                                 iii


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT                                                              iv


ABSTRACT                                                                                    vi


TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                viii


CHAPTER ONE


1.1     Background of the Study                                                                  1


1.2     Statement of the Problem                                                        7


1.3     Aims and Objectives of the Research                                                9


1.4     Scope of the Research                                                             9


1.5     Research Methodology                                                            10


1.6     Justification of the Study                                                                  10


1.7     Literatures Review                                                                  10


 


CHAPTER TWO: AN OVERVIEW OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE                                                                      18


2.1     Historical Evolution of the International Court of Justice                18


2.2     Membership of International Court of Justice                         22


2.3     Power and Jurisdiction of the Court                                        23


2.4     Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice                    26


2.5     International Court of Justice in Perspective                                    27


2.6     Mechanism for Enforcement of ICJ Judgments                       29


2.7     Pacific Settlement of Disputes Adjudication                                     31


2.8     Proceedings of the International Court of Justice                              36


CHAPTER THREE: ENFORCEMENT OF ICJ, JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF NIGERIA VS CAMEROON (BAKASSI PENINSULA) 39


3.1     Nigerian vs Cameroon: Facts of the Case                                41


3.2     Decision of International Court of Justice and its Consequences


                                   �

THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE A CASE STUDY OF THE BAKASSI PENINSULAR CONFLICT 1993-2002
For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

Share This
  • Type: Project
  • Department: History
  • Project ID: HIS0085
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 84 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 868
Payment Instruction
Bank payment for Nigerians, Make a payment of ₦ 5,000 to

Bank GTBANK
gtbank
Account Name Obiaks Business Venture
Account Number 0211074565

Bitcoin: Make a payment of 0.0005 to

Bitcoin(Btc)

btc wallet
Copy to clipboard Copy text

500
Leave a comment...

    Details

    Type Project
    Department History
    Project ID HIS0085
    Fee ₦5,000 ($14)
    No of Pages 84 Pages
    Format Microsoft Word

    Related Works

    ABSTRACT           The discovery of oil reserves in the waters surrounding Bakassi Peninsula subjected it to claims and counter-claims for sovereignty, military occupation and recourse to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). On October 10,2002, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Peninsula and the territory in the Lake... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT           The discovery of oil reserves in the waters surrounding Bakassi Peninsula subjected it to claims and counter-claims for sovereignty, military occupation and recourse to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). On October 10,2002, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Peninsula and the territory in the Lake... Continue Reading
    The history of peaceful settlement of dispute dates back from Jay Treaty of 1794 between U.S.A. & Great Britain. This treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation led to creation of mixed commissions and intended to functioN to some extent as tribunals. In 1872, the Albama claims arbitration between U.K. and U.S.A. marked the start of a 2nd Phase.... Continue Reading
    The history of peaceful settlement of dispute dates back from Jay Treaty of 1794 between U.S.A. & Great Britain. This treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation led to creation of mixed commissions and intended to functioN to some extent as tribunals. In 1872, the Albama claims arbitration between U.K. and U.S.A. marked the start of a 2nd Phase.... Continue Reading
    CONFLICT AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS A CASE STUDY OF THE BAKASSI PENINSULA TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE Understanding Conflict and Conflict Resolution CHAPTER TWO The Genesis of the Nigerian – Cameroon Boundary Dispute CHAPTER THREE The ICJ Judgment CHAPTER FOUR Conclusion Bibliography CHAPTER ONE UNDERSTANDING CONFLICT... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT The traditional focus of International Law has been upon the rights and obligations of states while International Criminal Law regulates the conduct of individuals and also punishes those who commit heinous and barbaric crimes against others. The... Continue Reading
    • Type:Project
    • ID:LAW0033
    • Department:Law
    • Pages:150
    ABSTRACT The traditional focus of International Law has been upon the rights and obligations of states while International Criminal Law regulates the conduct of individuals and also punishes those who commit heinous and barbaric crimes against others. The most prevalent of these crimes include genocide, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes... Continue Reading
    • Type:Project
    • ID:LAW0275
    • Department:Law
    • Pages:218
    ABSTRACT The traditional focus of International Law has been upon the rights and obligations of states while International Criminal Law regulates the conduct of individuals and also punishes those who commit heinous and barbaric crimes against others. The most prevalent of these crimes include genocide, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes... Continue Reading
    • Type:Project
    • ID:LAW0173
    • Department:Law
    • Pages:174
    ABSTRACT The traditional focus of International Law has been upon the rights and obligations of states while International Criminal Law regulates the conduct of individuals and also punishes those who commit heinous and barbaric crimes against others. The... Continue Reading
    • Type:Project
    • ID:LAW0027
    • Department:Law
    • Pages:150
    Abstract The traditional focus of International Law has been upon the rights and obligations of states while International Criminal Law regulates the conduct of individuals and also punishes those who commit heinous and barbaric crimes against others. The most prevalent of these crimes include genocide, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes... Continue Reading
    • Type:Project
    • ID:LAW0157
    • Department:Law
    • Pages:120
    Call Us
    Get this work
    whatsappWhatsApp Us