+234 813 0686 500
+234 809 3423 853
info@grossarchive.com

JUSTICE AND ITS PRIMACY IN THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF ARISTOTLE

  • Type:Project
  • Chapters:4
  • Pages:62
  • Format:Microsoft Word
(Philosophy Project Topics & Materials)

JUSTICE AND ITS PRIMACY IN THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF ARISTOTLE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE………………………………………..              i

CERTIFICATION…………………………………..             ii

DEDICATION………………………………………              iii

ACKNOWLEGEMENT…………………………….             iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………            vi

GENERAL INTRODUCTION………………………...                 viii

CHAPTER ONE

1.0     THE NOTION OF STATE AND JUSTICE……                 1

1.1     General Notion of State…………………………….      1

1.2     Notion of State in Aristotle…………………………     8

1.3     Notion and Definition of Justice……………………      16

1.4     Kinds of Justice…………………………………...                  20

1.4.1 Social Justice………………………………………                  20

1.4.2 Commutative Justice………………………………                  22

1.5     Aristotle Notion of Justice…………………………       23

CHAPTER TWO

2.0     APPLICATION OF JUSTICE IN THE STATE..      27

2.1     Justification of Slavery…………………………..          27

2.2     Justice vis-à-vis Types of Constitution……………                31

2.2.1 Monarchy…………………………………………                   33

2.2.1.1 Kingship………………………………………..           33

2.2.1.2 Tyranny…………………………………………                   34

2.2.2 Aristocracy………………………………………..                   36

2.2.3 Oligarchy………………………………………….                   37

2.2.4 Democracy………………………………………..                   38

2.3     The Best Justifiable and Practicable

Constitutions……...................................................                39

 

CHAPTER THREE

3.0     JUSTICE AND REVOLUTION IN THE STATE..   43

3.1     Equality as Justice……………………………………    43

3.2     Injustice as the Cause of Revolution in the state…….   45

3.3     The role of Education in the Application and                sustenance of Justice in the state…………………              48

CHAPTER FOUR

4.0     EVALUATION AND CONCLUSION………….                 53

4.1     Critical Evaluation……………………………….          53

4.2     Conclusion………………………………………            58

Bibliography……………………………………………...      60


GENERAL INTRODUCTION

The problem of the origin and harmonious organization of the state has been an age long problem for philosophers. They have varied opinions as regards the solution to this problem. The conventionalists and contractualists hold that the state originated out of convention or contract between individuals or groups. 

 However, Aristotle a master in ancient philosophical thought, whose influence has always rocked the philosophical defense of his contemporaries and successors, has it that the state is natural to man. Also, his refutation of the conventionalist’s notion of the state led him to redefine the state as an association of communities made up of citizens with the aim of achieving the highest common good.  Having defined the state thus, he sets himself the task of investigating the activities of the state in order to find out its end and goal; to find out who and who are qualified to be citizens of the state; and if all the members of the state are qualified to enjoy the basic individual rights in the state.

It is in this context that he brought in the issue of justice as the central point on which the activities of the state revolves.  Hence, I found it appropriate to treat as my project topic “Justice and its primacy in the political philosophy of Aristotle.”  As the political philosophy of Aristotle is concerned mainly with the governmental order of the state, we shall be using the word ‘state’ more frequent in this work.

Furthermore, this work shall be divided into four chapters.  Chapter one will deal with the meaning and notion of state and justice respectively, with special reference to Aristotle.  Chapter two will deal with the application of justice in the state.  Since man is naturally born in the state, there is the necessity for harmonious relationship between members of the state.  This harmonious co-existence can only be achieved through the application of justice in the state.

However, in different political organization, there are different constitutions applied.   Nevertheless, the application of justice lies in the governing principles of the constitution of that particular state.  Justice therefore always implies “Justice for whom.”  Here Aristotle seems to make justice relative.  However, he holds that though justice is often determined by a particular circumstance, there is on the whole a particular justice which other relative justice of different constitutions must square up to.  This is the absolute justice; that which justifies any constitution.  But since it aims towards the common good, it is guided by law and morality. Chapter three will concern itself with justice vis-à-vis revolution in the state.  Here we shall look into the consequence of the absence of justice in the state.  And if justice is necessary for the stability of any political organization, how do we restore it?  Moreover, since the problem of political stability depends on good rulership, it follows that present and future leaders must be educated and trained on the acquisition and practice of justice.  Hence the relevance of education and political awareness towards upholding justice and stability of government in the state. Finally, we shall end the work with chapter four which will deal with evaluation and conclusion of all that has been said.

JUSTICE AND ITS PRIMACY IN THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF ARISTOTLE

Share This

Details

Type Project
Department Philosophy
Project ID PHI0061
Price ₦3,000 ($9)
Chapters 4 Chapters
No of Pages 62 Pages
Format Microsoft Word

500
Leave a comment...

    Details

    Type Project
    Department Philosophy
    Project ID PHI0061
    Price ₦3,000 ($9)
    Chapters 4 Chapters
    No of Pages 62 Pages
    Format Microsoft Word

    Related Works

    CHAPTER ONE 1.1    INTRODUCTION Robert Nozick (1938-2002) was American philosopher, best known for his rigorous defense of libertarianism in his first major work,  Anarchy, State,   and Utopia  (1974). During his high school and college years, Nozick was a member of the student new left and an enthusiastic socialist. At Columbia, he helped... Continue Reading
    CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Robert Nozick (1938-2002) was an American philosopher, best known for his rigorous defense of libertarianism in his first major work,  Anarchy, State,   and Utopia  (1974). During his high school and college years, Nozick was a member of the student new left and an enthusiastic socialist. At Columbia, he helped to found... Continue Reading
    CHAPTER ONE THE BACKGROUND TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF DETRIBALISM 1.1            Tribalism And Nigerian Political Development   Ever since the marriage between the Northern and Southern Nigeria became a reality, Nigerians have made several attempts to... Continue Reading
      TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE…………………………………………………………………i CERTIFICATION…………………………………………..………ii DEDICATION……………………………………………………....iii... Continue Reading
    Abstract According to Taiwo (1980:75), for sense of national unity , a country where people are different races, and each race tries to emphasize its own importance and there are social or tribal... Continue Reading
        TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE.      .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         ii... Continue Reading
    CHAPTER ONE 1.0     BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 1.1     INTRODUCTION The sense of wonder is the mark of the philosophers.  Thus, according to Aristotle, “all men by nature desire to know”1.  On the same note, philosophically and otherwise, man has to give meaning to the mysteries befogging his... Continue Reading
    LIFE CRISIS (An Evaluative Rediscovery) CHAPTER   ONE DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPTS OF MAN 1.1     Origin of Man- An Evolutionary/Scientific... Continue Reading
      CHAPTER ONE 1.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Since time immemorial, people have held the view that men are superior to women. This vision of male supremacy is clearly reflected in all traditional families and societies to an extent that even women were made to accept that they are inferior nature. Over... Continue Reading
    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF ARISTOTLE’S CONCEPTION OF CAUSALITY ABSTRACT Causality has been variously defined, and even given an empirical understanding. Causality is derived from the term “cause which means anything capable of changing something else or that which “produces something (makes something happen; bring about the occurrence of... Continue Reading